When I first started going to the harness racing events 64 years ago, the crowds were healthy, the betting was fierce, and the pools were strong.
My second homes were the bowling alley and the racetracks like Sportsmanās Park and Maywood Parkā¦with Washington Park joining up in late 1962.
It was an exciting time trying to get my $2 to win on Dr. Hyslop, Poplar Sonny, Selka Chief pr Rockette Forbes, among others,
Meeting drivers like Bob Williams, Lou Rapone, Gene Riegle, Curly Smart, Dwayne Pletcher and Bob Farrington was, in these eyes, like meeting Babe Ruth or Lou Gehrig, neither of whom I ever met.
In those days, we had win, place and show wagering and a daily double on the betting menu and, by the late 1960ās, other āexoticā wagers were added like the āquinellaā (not so exotic), āexactaā (a bit more exotic) and ātrifectaā (still more exotic).
At some venues, they had a āBig Q,ā a wager necessitating the selection of back-to-back quinellas, which produced very healthy pools.
Per capita figures were strong and, if a Saturday night at Sportsmanās Park had 15,000 fans on hand, you could figure the handle at $1,500,000, give or take a hundred thouā¦
Of course, it took time for the pari-mutuels to grow when harness racing was in its ānight-timeā infancyā¦but, once the volcano of harness racing erupted, the lava flow was unstoppable.
When Roosevelt Raceway opened in 1940, they had a 27-night meeting with an average attendance of 2,784 and TOTAL handle for those 27 nights at $1,200,088āan average per night handle of $44,448 and per capita wagering at $15.96āyes, fifteen dollars and 96/100 cents in check writing terms.
Fast forward to 1946, when the Steve Phillips mobile starting gate came into play, the total handle was $53,839,659 with an average per night handle of $441,309 and per capita betting up to $45.86.
The 1960ās through the mid-1970ās is really when harness racing enjoyed its heyday at Roosevelt and Yonkers when wagering peaked at $314,250,315 at Roosevelt in 1974 with an average nightly handle of over $1.9 MILLION and per capita over $120.00.
There were warnings signs before that, though, as average nightly attendance, which had vaulted well over the 20,000 by 1957, had slacked off to under 15,000 by 1976āthe āblameā partially caused by new competition in the form of The Meadowlands about 38 miles away.
It was the same story for Yonkers.
The āmodern dayā Yonkers opened on April 27, 1950.
Actually, Yonkers featured thoroughbred racing on a one-mile oval until 1942 but wartime and gasoline rationing ended that, and they were forced to shift their operations to the Jamaica Race Course.
After that, New Yorkās Governor Dewey āsuggestedā to the Hambletonian Society that their greatest raceāThe Hambletonianābe race at Yonkers (and it was) because of the war-time restrictions on travel.
When it was decided to stay with harness racing at Yonkers, the track was re-worked into a half mile oval.
But, back on trackā¦
Their average nightly attendance at The Hilltop Oval was well over 20,000 patrons per night beginning in the late 1950ās and reached an average of over 25,000 in the mid-1960ās but, they, too, saw those numbers tumble to well below 10,000 after The Big M opened.
Of course, as computer systems became more sophisticated, even more exotic wagers were introduced with those wagering opportunities featuring much higher payoffs that the traditional win-place-show prices.
But, over the years, with attendance quickly dwindling and betting now completely automated, the simulcast era was foaled and wagering finally became offered from a cell phone with the BDHC member (Broken Down Horseplayers Club) relaxing on his easy chair.
So, for me, the question has arisen. āWhat havenāt we doneā¦and what can we do?ā
The answer: We havenāt adapted to change, and we MUST start adapting to change!
Just peek at what the casino industry has doneāso subtly, itās almost unnoticeable.
Remember the old 25 cent coin slot machines? Bells, cherries, bars, lemons, etc.
Today, there are no more ācoinsā and the cost to play is being raised pennies at a time without anyone realizing or caring.
Yes, there are 50 cent and 60 cent playsā¦but with multiple lines (from five lines to 100 lines) some with multiple screens to play as many as four games at once.
But the lure isā¦on each machine, there is a HUGE jackpotāthe MEGA jackpotāstaring one right in the face with bright lights, tremendous graphics, train horns roaring, dragons screaming fire, oriental music luring and inviting your participation and, literally, hundreds of other machines set in āATTRACT MODEā to get you in a very comfortable and cozy seat with your $20 bill or $100 bill ready to go.
Yes, they advertise the payout at 90% or moreā¦but all that does is give you some bang for your buck as, in as little as four minutes the $20 is just about gone and the $100 is down to,Ā first, $91, then $82, then $74, then $67ā¦then $61, $55, $49, $44, $40, $37, $33, $30, $27, $24, $21, $18, $16, $14, $12ā¦so on down to z-e-r-oā¦and thatās in a perfect world after paying you your hypothetical 90%.
Itās really ingenious!
And hereās another thingā¦New slot machines are always āfreshening up the floorā with 68 cent minimum betsā¦and 75 cent minimum betsā¦and 80 centā¦and 88 cent machinesā¦yes, only pennies different to the players but a magnitude of difference to the casino.
Whatās it all mean?
Yes, casinos have adapted to our changing world and racing has not!
And then came prop betting, which has attracted millions and millions of dollars of play with little resistance.
Every great success in prop betting has attracted headlinesā¦and thatās what harness racing needs badlyā¦headlinesā¦OUTSIDE OF OUR OWN LITTLE BUBBLE!
Many tracks are on crutches āthe left one being from casinos and the right one being from legislaturesāboth fragile crutches!
Casinos and legislatures are watching racing as closely as their surveillance personnel in casinos watch their playersā¦watching what racing will do to deserve their continued support.
What happened in Florida can happen anywhereā¦just wait and see!!!
Better yet, DONāT WAIT AND SEE!
Then, it will be too late.
One track today, receiving well over $100,000 per day in purse money, would have around $40,000 in purses, if based on handle alone.
Another paying $200,000, would be right around $50,000 without that left crutch!
Yet another track pays purses EXCEEDING handle!
Some tracks have such minute handle that a single $50 bet can drop the odds significantly.
Yes, this is an extreme example but, nevertheless, certainly reflects what is beginning to happen in our sport.
At one track recently the purse was twice the amount of the race handle and an additional $50 wager on the winner would have clipped the tote-board odds from 6 to 5 down to 4 to 5.
On a long-shot prop in the same race, a $50 wager would have dropped the odds from 11 to 1 down to 6 to 1.
Realizing that this doesnāt hurt the owner, trainer and driver here, it does hurt what should be the main artery in our sportāTHE BETTOR!
Sure, things are great in Ohio and Indiana and Kentucky and, for the most part, New York.
Things are decent, for now, in Pennsylvaniaā¦but itās a fight!
But just a few short decades ago, this sport was a flourishing industry in Illinois, California, Massachusetts, Delaware, Michigan and several other jurisdictions and they have disappeared right before our eyes with very little fight.
I hear complaints from BDHC members ācryingā that thereās no value in wagering anymore.
There are two schools of thought on that.
First, the argument is valid that win-place-show pools are so small in most places and a significant wager, say, $50 or more, can affect the odds, like shown above.
The Meadowlands is THE PLACE, of course, but thereās only one Meadowlands.
Second, there are so many viable exotic bets these days thatāitās like eating at a diner with a six-page menuāand that could be detrimental to and for the bettor.
The great thing about exotic bets is that they can return sizable payoffs but, looking at it from a āchurn point of view,ā the higher the payout, the more money is taken out of the churn poolsĀ in ānextā races because, for every big winner, say, one or two or three, there may be hundreds of losers with all that money off the table for future wagers during that racing programā¦so thatās the other side of the coin.
So, to satisfy the āwinā bettors and beef up their pools, once and for all, get rid of place and show betting andājust maybeāthat money could be directed to the win pool, beefing that up by as much as 50%.
Place wagering could be replaced with the trifecta and show wagering with an exacta.
Maybe a superfecta could cap a programā¦but anything more exotic just might not be advantageous in this fight for survival with a novel idea to replenish interest in our sport.
Next, since it has been well proven that larger payoffs, carryovers and guarantees bring in the moneyāno matter the takeoutāharness racing needs a LOTTERY GAME to join the gaming fray.
With that in mind, we construct a āPerfect Pickā contest featuring nine races with different tracks hosting the festivities as casinos have ālinkedā jackpots all over the nation. (Canada, youāre invited!)
The object, of course, will be to select the winners in all races with a āseedā of $2,000,000 to begin with tickets available via the āhandicappingā route or quick picksājust like the lotteryāand the prize continually increasing until hit.
The āPerfect Pick Lotteryā would be contested at any track accommodating at least nine horse fields with āscratchesā being replaced with the āfavoriteā in any particular race.
Quick picks would give the player the ability to spend any amount of money desired (minimum $2) with āsinglesā and ādeepsā available with āallsā in other races also available.
For you naysayers, remember, casinos got rid of the 25 cent āslotā in slot machines and replaced them with higher priced slots and more lines and casinos are doing very well these days with these modernized pools.
Weāre in a world of AI these days (artificial intelligence), folks, and itās about time harness racing gets involved with todayās technology to save our sport and help it thrive once again.
With that $2,000,000 seed to kick things off, here are smoother thoughts on prizes.
Picking eight of nine winners would offer a $500,000 prizeā¦
Seven would get one $100,000ā¦
Six would earn the winner $10,000ā¦
Five gets $100.
Donāt you think a $2 million dollar prize would be enough of a catalyst to get some interest in our sport.
How about a $500,000,000 top prize when it goes un-hit for a while?
This lottery could provide enough funds for many programs dear to the hearts of us allākeeping horses away from the kill pen, funding organizations that provide aftercare and training for second careers, rehabilitation services and an āEquine Social Securityā programā¦maybe the development of an educational program for those interested in our industry.
Iāll close this up by reminding that, in past Mane Attraction columns, the comparison has been made to global warming and the continual melting of our precious freshwater glaciers and its threat to mankind.
A chunk of that glacier has our sportāour history, our present and our futureāhas been melting away for decades and, once the glacial ice melts, the water left over will eventually meltā¦leaving nothing but memories.
I truly fear for that!
May The Horse Be With Youā¦
by John Berry, for Harnesslink